Educate - Engage - Empower

Fertility Appreciation Collaborative to Teach The Science

September 12, 2016

Debunking myths about FABMs with Dr. Duane

FACTS co-founder Dr. Duane was recently interviewed by Dr. Duane explaining myths about FABMsVerily magazine about some of the misconceptions surrounding fertility awareness based methods (FABMs) of family planning. Verily is a woman’s lifestyle magazine that “empowers and inspires women to be the best version of themselves”, and regularly features articles answering common questions women have about their health.

Over at Verily, Dr. Duane recently debunked 5 common myths about FABMs in order to help women “demystify the top expectations and assumptions” about fertility awareness based methods. These myths are based on Dr. Duane’s experiences both from her own practice and investigation. Both users and physicians alike should be aware of these misconceptions, so we wanted to share the article with our readers as well!

Please click over to Verily to read the full article, but here’s a preview of the first myth. Hopefully this one is common knowledge for all our FACTS readers by now!

Myth #1: FABMs are based on guesswork; it’s what people used before modern science developed contraception.

FABMs are based on solid scientific research of a woman’s reproductive physiology.

Dr. Duane explaining the science of FABMsEarly researchers discovered the link between ovulation and cyclical changes in cervical fluid as well as the rise in basal body temperature. Then in the 1920s, two independent researchers discovered that ovulation occurs consistently about 12-16 days prior to the woman’s next period. Based on this early research, physicians and researchers began to develop modern natural methods of family planning starting in the 1960s with the Billings and then Symptothermal methods—about the same time the pill was launched. In the 1970s, the Creighton Model was developed followed by the Marquette Method in the 1990s, and then the Standard Days and Two Day methods. These methods are not based on guess work but rather on observations of specific physical signs that are produced in response to the woman’s changing hormones.”

How much do you know about FABMS?

Do you think you can identify fact from fiction and call out the other 4 myths?

Head on over to Verily to learn more!


Inspired by what you read?

You can support the ongoing work of FACTS here. To connect with a member of our team, please email de*********@*****************ty.org. Interested in becoming an individual or organizational member? You can learn more and register here. To discuss with a member of our team, please email me********@*****************ty.org.


References

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

When Policy Meets Clinical Practice: FACTS Calls to Strengthen Medical Training in Women’s Health

By: Dr. Marguerite Duane and Natalia Rodriguez Director’s Note: At FACTS, we envision a medical culture in which fertility is

Trends & Implications of Pregnancy Timing Awareness: A Research Review

By: Natalie Sipes, DO Editor’s Note: Preconception counseling is a vital aspect of women’s health and reproductive planning. The earlier

A Physical Therapy Protocol for Women with Infertility: A Review of Research

By: Alina Salamatina, DO Editor’s Note: Dr. Alina Salamatina was a fourth-year medical student when she summarized an interesting study

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop

    Join Our Mailing List

    Stay connected with timely news, blog postings, and upcoming events with FACTS.